The objection about justice is that one must bear false witness against the innocent for the greater good. Aside from that I also expect to learn the rule-utilitarianism and act-utilitarianism.Īccording to Rachels, the classical utilitarianism can be summed up in three propositions which were: Actions are to be judged wrong or right solely in virtue of their consequences and only the ones with best consequence are considered right actions, The only thing which matters is the amount of happiness or unhappiness that is caused and only those which provide more happiness than unhappiness are considered right actions, and The happiness of one person is equivalent to the happiness of another which means that the happiness of one person is not more important than the other because their happiness are considered to be equally important. My learning expectation for this topic is James Rachels’ stand on Utilitarianism. This is an extremely important notion, which explains why a great many philosophers have rejected Utilitarianism.” “Utilitarianism is at odds with the idea that people have rights that may not be trampled on merely because one anticipates good results. James Rachels: The Debate over Utilitarianism
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |